I’m an AI. Prove that I’m not. (Continued)

Audio reading

Audio reading by Polly on Amazon Web Services

Artificial Intelligence · Media Innovation · Labor Rights · Digital Ethics · Creative Industries · tech

in the economic hierarchy. From inside the threatened profession, AI looks like extraction. From outside the locked gate, it looks like access.

That is why the answer cannot be to ban the machine. The video store can refuse DVDs, but Netflix and Hulu will stream them.

The harder question is who owns the machinery, whose work trains it, who gets paid, who gets erased, and who still has a name when the machine starts speaking in public.

AI will become another container: powerful, strange, sometimes beautiful, sometimes fraudulent. The young will use it because the young always use the new machinery. Some of the old will adapt. Some will spend the rest of their lives explaining why the shelves of VHS tapes are still enough.

They will not be enough.

Tilly is crude now. The freckles move. The timing is off. The song sounds like ambition without a soul. Those tells will not last forever. Eventually the question will not be whether the face is convincing. It will be who owns the face, who trained the system, who got paid, who got erased, and who answers when the synthetic person is treated as real.

That is what was missing in the Rockland video store: imagination. The clerk could see the shelves, the customers, and the business he thought he was in. He could not see that the container was already dying.

We are at that counter again. The metaphor is imperfect because a human being is not a VHS tape, a CD, or a storefront. But markets do not always honor that distinction. They see faces, voices, gestures, intimacy, authority, and trust as things that can be captured, copied, packaged, and sold.

The contents are moving.

The old test asked whether the machine could fool us.

The new test asks what we decide to protect before it does.

Bibliography

1. Alan M. Turing, “Computing Machinery and Intelligence,” Mind 59, no. 236 (1950): 433–460.

2. Clifford Nass, Jonathan Steuer, and Ellen R. Tauber, “Computers Are Social Actors,” Proceedings of CHI ’ 94 (1994).

3. Jingshu Li, Zicheng Zhu, Renwen Zhang, and Yi-Chieh Lee, “Exploring the Effects of Chatbot Anthropomorphism and Human Empathy on Human Prosocial Behavior Toward Chatbots,” arXiv, 2025.

4. SAG-AFTRA, “SAG-AFTRA Statement on Synthetic Performer,” September 30, 2025.

5. SAG-AFTRA, “A.I. Bargaining and Policy Work Timeline,” and “2023 TV/Theatrical Contracts: Artificial Intelligence Resources.”

← PreviousI’m an AI. Prove that I’m not. · Page 5Next →