The New Hampshire Statehouse has a way of turning national arguments into local invoices.
A debate that begins with the Second Amendment ends with a campus police chief wondering how to write a policy for dorm rooms. A federal promise about special education ends with a local school board trying to explain another property-tax increase. A fight over pandemic truth ends with legislators deciding whether they are doing oversight, science, or political re-litigation.
That was the pattern running through several Statehouse sessions in May and June: guns on campus, special-education costs, and COVID-19 oversight. They are not the same issue. They do not carry the same risks. But they share one useful feature. Each takes a slogan that sounds simple at the microphone and runs it through the machinery of actual government.
The machinery is where the trouble starts.
Guns on Campus
House Bill 1793 began as a broad campus-carry bill. In its amended Senate form, it would have prevented public colleges and universities from restricting non-lethal weapons on campus and from restricting firearms carried by faculty. It also would have created a committee to study campus carry and firearm storage on public higher-education campuses.¹
That sounds tidy until it leaves the page.